No Attribute Formation

It’s not recommended to have formation without void attributes. Such formations are similar to Utility classes in Java.

Incorrect:

# Foo.
[] > foo
  52 > spb

Correct:

# Foo.
[x] > foo
  x > sbp

It is also correct having an “attribute-free” formation, but only if its parent is a formation as well:

# Foo.
[x] > foo
  # Bar, have an access to `x`.
  [] > bar

Published on Mon May 26 13:15:48 UTC 2025.