No attribute formation

Formations without void attributes are not recommended. Such formations are similar to Utility classes in Java.

Incorrect:

# Foo.
[] > foo
  52 > spb

Correct:

# Foo.
[x] > foo
  x > sbp

An “attribute-free” formation is also correct, but only if its parent is a formation as well:

# Foo.
[x] > foo
  # Bar has access to `x`.
  [] > bar

Published on Fri Sep 12 07:13:58 UTC 2025.